Watch it. As I have been saying for three years, we are winning this war in Iraq. We are winning it and I question if there was ever a moment when we were not winning it. It is the one bright spot in this world, the one event that symbolizes the confluence between right and divine-like effort. It's a powerful statement by many Americans who have declared "this is right, we will fight even when all about us are losing their heads and blaming it on us."

In response to a question from the floor about DemocRat tax policies, Mikey said, "I do not know why you are so afraid of taxes."

Does anybody with integrity really care what Bill Clintoon has to say? Does anybody with a brain have any interest in Slick Willie's views?

White people, too, commit horrendous crimes. Hitler was white; Charley Manson is white. But the sad fact is that in the United States in 2007 most violent felonies and most murders are commited by members of an inferior subculture that is Black and Latino. That is not a biological inevitability; rather it is a sociological consequence of the Left's countenancing and rationalizing such criminal behavior for decades as "racism" and the natural consequence of "economic and legal injustice."

President Bush understands better than most that the peace and prosperity of the future is determined by the actions of and ideas held today. The war in Iraq might ultimately turn out to be a panacea for the Middle East, and a blessing for the U.S., precisely because it is creating new Ideas both there and across the world.

We should have gone to war in Iraq, irrespective of nuclear weapons, today's terrorists or oil. We need to win the battle of ideas and we are doing that. Counter-intuitively, the enormous confusion that defines the way we think about Iraq, the United States, and President Bush in particular, reflects this point. So profound is the confusion, that some vehemently argue that the world hates the United States more than ever before. Really? How can one know this? It is utter confabulated nonsense, driven primarily by two things: (1) those who hate the United States are "louder" now; (2) those who purport to understand popular sentiment improperly weigh the "loudness" of the America haters.

In reality, there are fewer America haters than there have ever been. I know this because it doesn't make sense and it isn't easy to hate America - thus precluding much of even the irrational America hatred. Arguing that the world hates the U.S. is the figurative equivalent of arguing that people hate air-conditioning, food, walls, and roofs. Do the Mexicans swarming across the border hate the U.S.? Do the Indonesians who received tremendous financial and logistal aid from the U.S. hate the stars and stripes? Do the Japanese, South Koreans, Canadians, Taiwanese, British, South Africans, Australians and innumerable others, who send trillions of dollars in investments to our shores, despise America? A little common sense quickly debunks the argument.

Ultimately the America haters are shrieking loudly, as President Bush smashes the remaining life out of them. Some view the extra noise as an indication of greater numbers; ironically, the opposite is true.

Buchanan touches on one interesting point; but, I add, he touches on it only by confusing it with the Bush's motive for war. Is the world ready for Democracy? No. Much of it may never be. President Bush errs to the extent that he thinks we can "democratize" Iraq and the world - if he thinks that at all. Bush is, however, remarkably prescient and insightful in his grasp of the importance of ideas. Unlike that fool Jared Diamond, who thinks that history is determined by the location of iron ingot, bacterium and saltpeter, intelligent men "see" that ideas have defined the course of human events. The Middle East was and is a breeding ground for confused human beings, many of whom have been indoctrinated with the wrong ideas and who are now irredeemably dedicated to the destruction of civilization. The United States is a proxy for civilization. It is the proxy for civilization. Hence, the America-haters direct their nefarious and explosive (pun intended) efforts towards us because they have been bred with the wrong ideas. President Bush went over to that pot of shit with a huge spoon, started stirring, and threw in some new ingredients. Ever since, the Monday morning quarterbacks, Buchanan included, have conflated "change" with "bad," forgetting that "bad" already predominated.

These are tumultuous times, and only the most lucid tactical visionaries understand where we might be headed. The rest is noise espoused by charlatans. And, there is a lot of noise.

This is my first exposure to that cable network. Bryant Gumbell does play-by-play for them and for this game.

He is awful. His voice is far too weak for sports announcing (it sounds like one of those shallow voice-overs that are done for already played games.) Gumbel is also highly opinionated but patently ignorant of football, and, finally, he is obviously reading, robot-like, from a newscasters canned script in his commentary about players and teams and analysis of events.

In short, Gumbel is every bit as bad a sports announcer as he was a newscaster/TV Today Show host.

All of the DemocRat candidates stand for lax immigration enforcement and open borders. They welcome Illegalatinos because an explosion in the welfare state means more votes.

What to do?

First, kill all the schools of education and journalism. Then, outlaw the National Education Association and all public teachers' unions. Third, provide vouchers for all public school students who wish to attend a private school.

The public education system in America is the biggest, most destructive monopoly in U.S. history.

Today, Gore is an incredibly wealthy man who stands to become a great deal richer as a result of his environmental demagoguery.

But Gore, most assuredly, is not a true environmentalist. Gore is, rather, a crypto Monty Byrnes. He is but a devious Once-ler peddling useless Sneeds in order to enhance his fortune. And, most sadly, Gore is a man whose personal greed has done incalculable long-term harm to the causes of environmntal protection and nature conservancy.

Yet, Gore, the Nobel Laureate, is also a cowardly intellectual fraud who is afraid to debate experts who might expose his felonious hawking of needless Sneeds.

However, there are real Loraxes to be found outside the world of political deception. Indeed, we know personally and well of one such Lorax, and we urge our readers to go to this link, click on "Vote for the 2008 Conservationist of the Year," and vote for our friend, Lowell Baier, as Conservationist of the Year.

Who are their clients? Greenhouse gas/alternative energy investors and corporate beneficiaries?

In a speech before a joint session of our Congress today for which he received a standing ovation, President Sarkozy called America, "the greatest country on earth."

The Left, as it has always done, continues to destroy the very environmental and life values that it has always so hypocritically, falsely promoted.

You see, the California out-of-control fires are the sole result of eco-terrorists (motivated, possibly, by Al Gore-type rhetoric about saving the planet from capitalism) and Al Gore-type environmental wackos who, in California (as with the tree-huggers in Montana's horrendous forest fires last year) have steadfastly opposed any serious attempt to clear cut the underbrush chapparal. Indeed, these wackos have forced legislative restrictions on the capacity of California homeowners even to control the chapparal on their own property.

I say that they are the same forces and that Al "Qaeda" Gore is among their principal faciitators.

That is to say: Al "Qaeda" Gore spreads very harmful, indeed, incendiary, globally-destructive environmental and political lies and half-truths masquerading as eco-facts and that his goal in doing so is to set a torch to the economic well-being and destroy the foundation of Western Civilization.

Was that not the tactic and goal of aL Qaeda in destroying the World Trade Center? Is that not the goal of the arsonist conspirators, ELF?

Whatever he says, Colmes always confirms my conclusion: Colmes, while not a bad man, nevertheless, is the most intellectually stunted and morally deformed of human beings. (Can we blame his environment?)

Tonight, on Hannity and Colmes, "Sad Alan" was interviewing two survivors of the Malibu forest fire that is destroying the homes of the rich and famous. "Sad Alan" interviewed a husband, who fled his burning home in one car, and his wife, who fled the deadly fire in a separate car. Each spouse related to "Sad Alan" how their cars caught fire and exploded in the middle of their harrowing flights of escape.

At that very point, as each of the spouses told of their near-death experiences, of their harrowing escapes in cars that were engulfed in flames and blocked by explosons, "Sad Alan" asked (I KID YOU NOT),

"How did you decide what personal belongings to take with you when you fled your home?"

My case study involves yet another lamentable, legally ridiculous example of lilly-livered Leftists on the Bench overturning our constitution, this time by staying the execution of a "Monster" who bashed in the brains of a father of two small children so the Monster could rob the victim and buy crack cocaine. The Monster was, until the Supreme Court itervened, scheduled to die by lethal injection, a death penalty procedure invented and refined solely in response to Leftist demands that the death penalty be made "humane" for monsters (Ha Ha!!!)

To paraphrase what the brother of the victim said upon learning of the Supreme Court's "Do-Gooder" stay of the Monster's execution, "He should die like my brother died (his brain smashed in). How can he (the Monster) complain that lethal injection is cruel and unusual."

Who could posiibly disagree, except those cruel and unusual minions who are rooting for and pushing for the death of the greatest civilization the world has known?

In reporting this story about a cruel and unusual reprieve for a Monster, a "professional journalist" wrote:

"The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday halted Virginia's execution of a man who murdered a co-worker just hours before he was to be put to death."

I used to think that journalists were merely mis-educated people who studied too much the mundane process of reporting and the elementary technique of pedestrian writing while learning nothing of substance during their mis-spent college careers. Yet, more and more, I see the destruction of language at the hands of these educational miscreants.

Logic, language, and the perception of reality are inextricably linked. The demise of language at the hands of journalists is, like the destruction of law at the hands of judges, a woeful predicament.

Sandy Berger's and his law firm came up on my talent search screen, so I invited him to my office for an interview. In effect, I had, unbeknownst to me, the opportunity at that time to meet the future National Security Advisor of the Clintoon Administration and to evaluate his qualifications even before the Clintoons decided that Berger was qualified to protect the national security of America.

During his job interview, I listened to Sandy's canned pitch as to all the Congressmen he knew (Democrats) and all the special lobbying maneuvers he could take to solve my client's legislative problem. After 20 minutes, I ended his job interview, and Berger left my office. He was not hired by my client for its lobbying job, but he went on, immediately thereafter, to far far greater career heights than the mere pedestrian lobbying challenge presented by my client's Congressional problem. Berger went on to prove the "Peter Principle," that an aggressive careerist will rise to his level of incompetence

I'll never forget my amazement shortly after Berger's job interview with me in hearing the news that the Clintoons had named him as their National Security Advisor. The rest of the story, that of Sandy Berger's consistent ineptitude in matters of national security and his disgraceful criminal behavior, is but sad history, now.

He is also, I have just discovered, a narrow-minded, politically naive, self-righteous fool!

Tonight, on \\\"Hannity and Colmes\\\" Dobson vowed to oppose all of the major contenders for the Republican presidential nomination on \\\"moral\\\" grounds, and he threatened to support a third party movement in the general election should Giuliani, Thompson, Romney or McCain receive the Republican nomination.

Dobson also denied, incredibly, the factual reality that if the religious right abandons the Republican Party Hillary Clinton, who is pro-abortion and pro-gay marriage, will be the next President. That, in turn, will mean that the Democrats will be able to nominate Justices to the Supreme Court and to support legislation that will assuredly harm for decades, if not irreparably, Dobson\\\'s overriding causes of family values and the right to life.

Thus, you might imagine my chagrin, tonight, on hearing a TV commercial during the American League baseball playoff game between the Boston Red Sox and the Los Angeles Angles telecast on TBS. The commercial was by the international insurance conglomerate, AIG. It was about economic security of the elderly and financial well-being during old age.

The AIG commercial declared, "Remember! Never outlive your money. AIG."

Is that not a perfect convergenge of the irrational, counter-cultural force of intellectual ignorance and the destructive, anti-social power of hedonistic solipsism?

"Mayor" Helmke is now affiliated with the "Brady Campaign" against handguns, a pathetic outgrowth of the assassination attempt on President Reagan which nearly killed him and maimed his press secretary, Jim Brady, whose wife, in retaliation for her grief, chose to attack the weapon and not the evil perpetrator of her loss.

Tonight on CNN's "Glenn Beck" show, which discussed the potential Supreme Court challenge to D.C.'s total ban on hand guns, "Mayor" Helmke said that hand gun bans work because (are you ready for this???) after the District of Columbia banned the right of ANY person to own ANY handgun in his home or to possess ANY handgun on his person under Any circumstances the rate of SUICIDE by handgun had decreased in the Nation's Capitol.

Surely, the Democrats and "Mayor" Helmke are correct: the historic, indisputable "Right of Self Defense" under common law and, later, under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution did not countenance the reality of an epidemic of post-modern suicide attempts.